Then I come across an article that's credited to two people that just reads like a comment section: 'We get distracted at home': Wellington debates pros and cons of WFH | RNZ News
The whole article is just - here are some people with opinions on the thing:
Four people have opinions - that's the whole article.
- Former dentist Julie Towarek reckons there's "nothing wrong with it [doing chores on the clock], but you know, let's face it."
- IT worker Aaron Eldridge reckons some people take the piss and some people do better from work and he's a "really big advocate for mental health". Really big.
- An unnamed woman saves around $350 a fortnight since she can WFH.
- Jacinta Harrop prefers the office but she knows others prefer home.
No contextual information.
No data or statistics.
No expert opinion or analysis.
Just reckons.
Coolcoolcool.
No comments:
Post a Comment